|
A Question of Vigilance: Can the Ego Be Vigilant?
Questioner: There is a sentence in the text that says, "By deciding
against your reality you have made yourself vigilant against God and
his kingdom and it is this vigilance that makes you afraid to remember
this." What kind of vigilance is this? Can the ego be vigilant?
Speaker: That's a really good question. Let's see. Let's look at this.
In the course Jesus says (paraphrasing) `be vigilant until you no longer
need to be vigilant'. But the vigilance in this sentence you are asking
about is a different quality of vigilance. Vigilance is of the ego,
as the perceptual realm is of the ego, but it can be used for the purpose
of attentiveness by the Holy Spirit. But, this is a different context
being expressed here in the quote you gave. So let's take a look at
this. "By deciding against reality you have made yourself vigilant
against God and his Kingdom…." So, what he means is; you
will do anything to deny God's reality and uphold your own - being vigilant
for your own perceived reality, or he says, you made a decision for
your own - deciding is of the self concept. Only the split mind believes
in choice/decision.
So the belief in an America, the belief in a Canada… all these
different concepts; I'm a Canadian, I'm an American or I'm an African
American or I'm British or I'm Australian. All these are concepts and
we find ourselves defending them because we believe this is who we are.
We believe we have a choice to be who we want to be. And we are very
vigilant in protecting what we have made. If someone comes along and
says, "Well, America stinks" or " Australia stinks"
or " Canada , you guys are wimps!" I've heard that at my television
show a couple weeks ago. The camera man got angry at the body of Speaker
because he said Canada doesn't join America in the war. I didn't say
a thing to him. I don't believe in either one, birth is a concept that
denies the Christ. But, by his reaction, seemingly, he was upset because
from his perspective Canada was not joining America in the war. He was
defending his concept of America and what he thinks he knows America
is and how it's supposed to be protected. He was offended. But, see
how complex this `i-know- mind' is? What am I not? I am not Canadian.
I am not born in a body. I am not the perception. Jesus spoke of this
in the below quote from the book of John, "The Jews replied, "You
aren't 50 years old yet, and You've seen Abraham?" 58 Jesus said
to them, "I assure you: Before Abraham was, I am." Jesus is
telling us before Abraham was I Am. There is nothing that comes after
I Am. I am not the name 'Speaker'. I am not the citizenship of the country
the body was born in. The Christ is not a label nor is it a part of
time and space. Jesus says in this sentence from the Course, "You
are vigilant against God and his kingdom." So, every time you're
upset and you think you know something, it means you want to be right.
What he is saying is that it is then when you're vigilant against God
and his kingdom, defending your illusion over God's reality. And then
he says, "it is this vigilance that makes you afraid to remember
him."
And that's the key. Because we believe we've really separated, now we're
afraid that we've done something wrong by pretending that we know something
other than God's knowledge <changeless, eternal love>. By pretending
that the separation is real then, we are fearful of remembering God
because we really believe in the impossible, and this kind of vigilance
is the ego's vigilance, that is; defending the illusions. One can only
be vigilant in the perceptual realm. Be vigilant for the kingdom because
the mind is very resistant. The egoic mind is vigilant for idols. Be
vigilant in the exposing of the idols. "The calm being of God's
Kingdom, which in your sane mind is perfectly conscious, is ruthlessly
banished from the part of the mind the ego rules. The ego is desperate
because it opposes literally invincible odds, whether you are asleep
or awake. Consider how much vigilance you have been willing to exert
to protect your ego, and how little to protect your right mind. Who
but the insane would undertake to believe what is not true, and then
protect this belief at the cost of truth?" ACIM
What you've made is false knowledge and the split mind is very vigilant
in keeping it and this is what maintains the world seemingly in its
chaotic state. Thinking that we know something, and in fact we can't
know anything in the perceptual realm. Right- mindedness is the correction
of this wrong-minded attempt to order ones reality. Right-mindedness
is not to be confused with the knowing mind <God's knowledge>,
because it is applicable only to right perception. This is why in the
early workbook, Jesus says, "You do not know what anything is for.
You think you know what a telephone is for and he's letting us know
that we don't know what anything is for. We have to be open to seeing
that, ` I don't know anything because I'm attempting to decide reality
for myself and this is why I'm afraid because every time I attempt to
make reality for myself, I'm misusing the law of the kingdom, the law
of love.' This attempt to decide reality is why guilt arises in awareness.
There's a sense of knowingness that the mind is not being used for the
purposes of creation, but to make illusions. This results in fear because we believe the illusions to be real and
we'll do anything to protect them. "The ego will be very vigilant
against God and His kingdom." ACIM.
In order to be clear on the idea of vigilance, first we must look at
the ego idea of vigilance the Holy Spirit's purpose for vigilance. So
there seem to be two alternatives, two choices. Out of all the choices
in the world, all of the decisions that one could possibly make, this
narrows it down to just two. There is a great simplification in this.
Let's say these two choices are the potential solutions to any one seeming
problem. The first solution is to unmask the ego. The second solution
is to continue in the state of achieving, becoming and seeking for surface-level
changes.
The former solution is to unmask and unravel the ego and its schemes
to save it self-self concept. The latter entails a continuance of seeking
for a better illusion, seeking for salvation where it can't be found,
a continuation of the `rat race'. The first choice will take effort
but it is like unraveling a ball of yarn, which has an eventual end.
The second choice also requires effort, but in this effort it perpetuates
all sorts of suffering. So, although both require effort and vigilance
we can say that because of the outcome, only one of these choices is
a real alternative. Only one leads to the kingdom.
Questioner: That must mean I really have no choice to be what I want
to be? So there is really no choice at all?
Speaker: If there is one choice then, there must be no choice, because
choice implies two or more. And if there is only one real choice that
leads to Reality then there is no choice. Really, the choice for the
right-mind is a choice to have the Holy Spirit decide for you, so one
really never had a choice, but an illusion of choice. But this is too
simple for the ego. The ego needs something to be for or against, or
it will cease to `exist'. So, the ego uses concepts, ideas and beliefs
and attaches itself to these ideas and then thinks that this is who
it is, "I'm an American. I'm Catholic. I'm Buddhist. I'm this and
I'm that and I'm Christian. i know, i know, i know." So, it gets
lost in the `I know' and really it's just a defense against the memory
of knowledge that's available in the Holy Instant. The Holy Instant
is where knowledge is reflected and where love is remembered. This is
where; we meet the Holy Spirit, in the present moment, right now. The
Course tells us, "To teach the whole Sonship without exception
demonstrates that you perceive its wholeness, and have learned that
it is one. Now you must be vigilant to hold its oneness in your mind
because, if you let doubt enter, you will lose awareness of its wholeness
and will be unable to teach it. The wholeness of the Kingdom does not
depend on your perception, but your awareness of its wholeness does.
It is only your awareness that needs protection, since being cannot
be assailed. Yet a real sense of being cannot be yours while you are
doubtful of what you are. This is why vigilance is essential. Doubts
about being must not enter your mind, or you cannot know what you are
with certainty. Certainty is of God for you. Vigilance is not necessary
for truth, but it is necessary against illusions." Thank you for
your question.
|